Відео

Amazing

Your twerking

Thanks, I was very confused on how to use y~mx1+b, this video helped alot :)

. I am going to document myexperiences🧲 on this channel.. Camp Pendleton's Qwantumley Intangled Q¡¡'s🎳, General Thomas Bev. Sco++ will be as well, 2×2. 🧮🧮 🃏 🤡 🃏 I am almost positivee. I also Atrophied @ll the lil þ¡¡pel- 🏆Killah Qlown Possé My artifacts, my library, my qipu's. My books. I want my books. V○¡n¡ch(ə & Old Muthah Hubbids Cupboards. East Coast Syntac, Definitely. After All, "George ə". Scott is dead. Lepht, lepht, lepht, right, lepht.. 🪖🪖 🤧🫳🫳👈🎨 🐴 nè 🎠📿ion 🦴a p🖼 ☮️✌️Piece🥧 🎼Goodbye Horses.

AS, Great Demo! I was born on March 7th♓️ 1972. Just recently I began sketching and drawing the Flower Of Life. My Father, Daniel( who exited this realm at the age of 40🪐☄️) was a Draftsman of the Stealth Bomber in the 80's, had also been an art professor at S.M.U(now UMass) in Massachusetts. He taught me many helpful 'tri×× of the ar+ +rade' that have also helped to bring me to this philosophical question... If Pyramids represent the 'typical' Human form, how would the shape of My Firstborn Son, Isaiah, who was born with an A-typical ElongatedSkull (🪐☄️who exited this realm at 30 years of age) be represented? 🧞‍♂️🧞‍♀️🧞 Edit: 1:49 @.m. E.S.T. Isaiah was also born on The Winter Solstice, December 21st, of 1987.which is also the year known as "Summer of Progress". Which, oddly enough, is also the year Sagittarius A made itself known to the astronomical world. Pretty cool stuuf imo. Since being shocked, in 2020 of all yeard😊 🔮years, I 'see' with all of my senses. Even taste at times...which isnt always all it's cracked up to B🐣. ©️.■dd & ®️.●dd+○d🎣

YOOOO THIS WAS BETTER THAN HOW MY TEACHER TAUGHT IT

The way you explained this was awesome! and the fact that you look happy doing math inspires me to also see math as a fun hobby instead of thinking it as a hard subject :D

due to how complex this method is, i think this would drive a mathematician insane so i tried it with 1101.64 and here's how it went: 1. i had to *estimate* which square is the largest without going over, most commonly done with *trial and error* (i got 33) 2. oh right you have to divide it into groups of 2 digits (__ . __ is ok, and not _ _._ _) 3. write the estimated number to the left of the √ symbol and above (the last digit of that number should be uhhhhh just write that placed down like normal long division) 4. the decimal i wanted to square root had digits after the decimal point, so copy that down (but if it has 1 or 0, then just write zeros instead) (so i have "≤ 1264" 5. uhhhhhhhhh 2:12 yeah i have no idea how to explain this part (i write 1 here) 6. ............. ………………………………………… and you just repeat step 5 and 6

Is a slide rule same as a caculator?

Is a slide rule same as a caculator?

What is a slide rule, used for?

What is a slide rule, used for?

then how about 37?

A meter is equal to 100 centimeters. 1 Solon cubit = 40 times √φ = 50.88078598056276 centimeters. If 1 Solon cubit is divided into 20 equal units of measure then 20 inches can be derived because 1 Solon cubit is equal to 20 inches. 1 Saylen cubit = 50 times √φ = 63.60098247570345 centimeters. If 1 Saylen cubit is divided into 25 equal units of measure then 25 inches can be derived because 1 Saylen cubit is equal to 25 inches. The correct inch of 2 times √φ = 2.544039299028138 centimeters can be derived if the shortest edge length of a Kepler right triangle is equal to 24 centimeters, while the second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is divided into 12 equal parts, because 12 inches are equal to 1 foot and 1 foot = 24 times √φ = 30.528471588337655 centimeters. The second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is 1 foot in the first example and another Kepler right triangle can be created with its shortest edge length also being equal to 1 foot = 24 times √φ = 30.528471588337655 centimeters. (The shortest edge length of the Kepler right triangle contains half the amount of centimeters compared to the amount of inches that are contained in the second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle, for example the shortest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is 24 centimeters while the second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle contains 12 inches that are equal to 1 foot and 1 foot = 24 times √φ = 30.528471588337655 centimeters).

A meter is equal to 100 centimeters. 1 Solon cubit = 40 times √φ = 50.88078598056276 centimeters. If 1 Solon cubit is divided into 20 equal units of measure then 20 inches can be derived because 1 Solon cubit is equal to 20 inches. 1 Saylen cubit = 50 times √φ = 63.60098247570345 centimeters. If 1 Saylen cubit is divided into 25 equal units of measure then 25 inches can be derived because 1 Saylen cubit is equal to 25 inches. The correct inch of 2 times √φ = 2.544039299028138 centimeters can be derived if the shortest edge length of a Kepler right triangle is equal to 24 centimeters, while the second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is divided into 12 equal parts, because 12 inches are equal to 1 foot and 1 foot = 24 times √φ = 30.528471588337655 centimeters. The second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is 1 foot in the first example and another Kepler right triangle can be created with its shortest edge length also being equal to 1 foot = 24 times √φ = 30.528471588337655 centimeters. (The shortest edge length of the Kepler right triangle contains half the amount of centimeters compared to the amount of inches that are contained in the second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle, for example the shortest edge length of the Kepler right triangle is 24 centimeters while the second longest edge length of the Kepler right triangle contains 12 inches that are equal to 1 foot and 1 foot = 24 times √φ = 30.528471588337655 centimeters).

Maybe I'm a little slow, I was okay till ya added (2) 00 zeros! Why do you add the two zeros, what's the purpose?😂

W VIDEO and W TEACHER🤙🤙❤‍🔥🔥👍

1 million views and just 10k likes?? Bro thats unfair

That's Genius. Idk why haven't this got more views

Biggest stupid

So many more subs than me

So much helpful, thank you

Damn this is actually epic thanks captain

Verbose

Thank you so much

Thanks. appreciate that.

very cool we can get an exact answer. How does it work?

Such a fascinating video, i could watch these sort of lectures for hours.

The process here is really Newton's method based on finding the intersection of the tangent line at the estimated square root. You could have picked 7, or any number, and it will converge to the root. Example 38/7 = 5.43, add 7, 12.43, divide by 2, 6.21. 38/6.21 = 6.11, add 6.21 = 12.32, divide by 2 = 6.16. Reason - d/dx x^2 = 2x thus the division by 2. You can use the same method to take cube roots or nth roots depending on your patience :) You are estimating a function by its tangent line at the point in question.

Thank you, Sir! But if I may ask, what went through your mind that you thought of this method? What made you go beyond the comfortable boundary and thought "Ey, this could work!"?

This video is titled , "How to Find the length of a Cord". What the hell are you doing showing how to covert degrees into radians.. Stay the course lad.

I completely disagree. I believe you illustrated this information brilliantly. We can mince words all day long but the heart of the issue is clear. I walk away with a simple understanding that ten other videos couldn't bring into focus for me. So thank you.

I wonder how long it would take to do the whole process

Thank you for your help. I got an A on my assignment 😊👍

To be Honest for me this is a rare tutorial video on how to find the square root of non-perfect square numbers

جاکش مزخرف است

This not a short cut method |!

Wouldn't this be close enough? Especially as the number you are working with the result gets closer and closer to the exact answer? ua-cam.com/video/t9Hhkk0TB1g/v-deo.html

Calculator to nhi chahiye pr D scale ki zrurt pdegi😅

Why in the world are you using the Protractor?!

Thank God for calculators!

👍

:O this is so easy! thanks!

lefthanded brother and sister!

Using your method find the square root of 600

My mistake, i meant to say 38 not 36.

Why don't you just divide 36 by 6 and take it to 2 decimal places?

I would rather stick to iterative comparisons

Couldn't you just divide the remainder by 2 times the numerator in the division step? Another words, in your example, divide 2 by 12.

Cool but this taught me nothing. :)